SAN JOSE, CA – SEPTEMBER 17: Elizabeth Holmes, former Theranos Founder and CEO, … [+]
There is no compassion in social media, only passion.
If you can’t imagine, look for the title “Elizabeth Holmes” on Twitter.
The father of the founder of the now defunct blood testing agency Theranos is currently on trial for fraud, but a look at some of the Twitter feedback suggests she might actually be a beloved TV star or perhaps a felony.
For some, the decision has already been made. Because, after all, the everyday account holder knows everything about startup traditions and the fickleness of Massive Science. Nevertheless, others are trying to solve it. We all have opinions, so it’s never been easier to share. Holmes speaks in a low voice, which is probably fake, so for this fact she should be held accountable. It doesn’t take much time.
Among the posts that delight her hair and outfits, others are figuring out what should have happened behind the scenes of the company.
So far, one of my favorites is the memes related to the movie. sand dune This is how Holmes simply “uses his voice” to impress the courts and dictate the final outcome. (I’ll admit I’ve only seen a few documentaries and YouTube movies where she’s been interviewed, and she seems to use almost completely different voices depending on the topic at hand.)
Many posters have decided that actress Rosamund Pike should play her in an upcoming movie. Others keep posting wig images on the market.
The most common tweets contain images of Holmes walking into court, along with hyperlinks to articles about the trial. In general, we all include sarcastic remarks to let us know that it is simply an excessive amount. After all, there are usually a few video clips showing her arrival in court documents.
That’s all today. Approved assessments have no depth.
You can’t properly resolve whether your social media customers like her or hate her. There is a clear attraction to the founder of a company that went bankrupt in such a short period of time.
I’ve been writing about myself for years with sheer audacity and minimal compensation for how someone could be sucked into such an allegation of fraud. (In the trial, her legal experts argue that it was other people in the company who deceived her and never the other way around.)
What will make all of that?
First of all, social media customers are fickle. We love one thing one day and then hate it. As with many gossip journals, articles in social media research should have minimal appeal so that we have time to criticize them in the first place.
We go one step further and tell you what kind of genius can find himself on the duvet of several well-known magazines. In addition, this nagging is the envy of the truth that no matter what crime needs to be committed, someone must have that degree of fame and some level of competence and expertise. And envy is the driving force.
Ultimately we’ll see how the trial finally ends, but at this time the social media jury has not been fully decided. They like to entertain her. It is positive.